Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies

From: Variation in clinical outcomes and process of care measures in community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review

Author & Year

Study Design

Country

Number of subunit compared

Total study population

Quality score

POC, Outcome or Both

Variation in Patient population between units

Variation in hospital type / subunit

Variation in disease factors

Subunit of variation: Geographical region or country

Arnold et al. [12] 2013

Retrospective Cohort

International – 16 countries across USA, Canada, Europe and Latin America

70 hospitals across 3 geographical regions (USA/Canada, Europe, Latin America)

6371

9.5

Both

Significant differences in baseline populations. Latin America lowest prevalence of every co-morbidity.

Variation between hospitals grouped by continents. International variation in healthcare practice and resources.

Europe - fewest low severity scoring patients, greatest number of high severity scoring patients.

Blasi et al. [13] 2013

Retrospective Cohort

International - Europe

10 countries (128 sites)

2039

6.5

Outcome

Not reported

Not reported

Included HCAP in addition to CAP

Lave et al. [23] 1996

Retrospective Analysis of Administrative data

USA

7 geographical regions

36,222

7

Both

Not reported

All hospitals part of a larger non-profit organisation. Bed size varies 80–500 beds. Teaching and non-teaching facilities.

Not reported

Remond et al. [27] 2010

Mixed Prospective / Retrospective Cohort

Australia

2 regions (7 hospitals)

293

6.5

Both

Different ethnicity between cohorts

Six small regional hospitals in the Kimberley, one tertiary hospital in Central Australia

Regional differences in isolated causative organisms.

Subunit of variation: Hospital

Aelvoet et al. [11] 2016

Retrospective Analysis of Administrative data

Belgium

111 hospitals

108,213

7

Outcome

Not reported

All hospitals in Belgium

Not reported

Cabre et al. [14] 2004

Retrospective Cohort

Spain

27 hospitals

1920

6.5

Both

The number of comorbidities varied among hospitals.

All community hospitals - urban and rural

Proportion of patients belonging to each risk class (by PSI) varied widely among hospitals

Capelastegui et al. [15] 2005

Retrospective Cohort

Spain

5 hospitals

1498

6

Both

Statistically significant differences in patient demographic factors between hospitals.

All teaching general hospitals with similar resources

Statistically significant differences in PSI score classification between hospitals

Dedier et al. [16] 2001

Retrospective Cohort

USA

38 hospitals

1062

5

Both

Not reported

All academic hospitals

Not reported

Feagan et al. [17] 2000

Retrospective Cohort

Canada

20 hospitals

858

6.5

Both

Only comparison reported between teaching and general hospital populations

11 teaching hospitals, 9 community hospitals

Not reported

Fine et al. [10] 1993

Prospective Cohort

USA

4 hospitals

552

9.5

Both

Mean number of comorbid conditions per patient varied significantly among hospitals.

2 university hospitals, one veterans hospitals, one community hospital

Disease severity and aetiology similar across hospitals

Garau et al. [18] 2008

Retrospective Cohort

Spain

10 hospitals

3233

8

Outcome

Not reported

All tertiary hospitals

Proportion of patients belonging to each PSI class varied widely across hospitals, as did the proportion with an aetiological diagnosis.

Gilbert et al. [19] 1998

Prospective Cohort

USA/Canada

4 hospitals

1328

9.5

Both

Significant differences in mean age, gender, racial distribution and comorbidities among the 4 sites.

Three university teaching hospitals, one community teaching

Statistically significant differences in causative organisms identified and severity of illness.

Hedlund et al. [20] 2002

Retrospective Cohort

Sweden

17 hospitals

982

5

Outcome

 

Seven university hospitals, 10 county hospitals.

The mean PSI varied between 0.9 and 1.9 at different sites

Iroezindu et al. [21] 2016

Prospective Case control

Nigeria

4 hospitals

400

6

Outcome

Not reported

All tertiary hospitals

Not reported

Klausen et al. [31] 2012

Retrospective Analysis of Administrative data

Denmark

22 hospitals

11,322

8.5

Outcome

Not reported

All Danish public health hospitals

Not reported

Laing et al. [22] 2004

Prospective Cohort

New Zealand

2 hospitals

474

7

Both

Similar demographics between the two populations except significant differences in ethnicity and rates of COPD.

“Similar institutions”

No significant differences in disease severity by PSI.

Malone et al. [24] 2001

Retrospective Cohort

USA

5 hospitals

330 (52 severe)

5.5

POC

Not reported

All acute care facilities (Centura)

Not reported

McCormick et al. [25] 1999

Prospective Cohort

USA/Canada

4 hospitals

1188

9

Both

A younger more mixed-race population identified at one site. The proportion admitted from a nursing home varied from 9 to 16%.

Three university teaching hospitals, one community teaching

Severity of illness and symptom profiles were similar across hospitals. One hospital had fewer “high risk” aetiology.

Menendez et al. [26] 2003

Prospective Cohort

Spain

4 hospitals

425

7

NA

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Reyes Calzada et al. [28] 2007

Prospective Cohort

Spain

4 hospitals

425

6

Both

No significant differences in co-morbidity, age and sex. Smoking significantly more frequent in two hospitals.

One tertiary and 3 district general hospitals

Not reported

Schouten et al. [29] 2005

Analysis of baseline population from RCT

Netherlands

8 hospitals

436

6.5

POC

Not reported

Eight medium sized hospitals in the south-east of the Netherlands

Not reported

Sow et al. [30] 1996

Prospective Cohort

France and New Guinea

2 hospitals

333

5

Outcome

Mean age and pre-existing illness rate was significantly lower in Guinea than France.

One hospital in the Republic of Guinea compared to one in France

Similar severity between cohorts (clinical definition not validated severity score)