Skip to main content

Candida species in community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic aspiration



When Candida species is found in a sputum culture, clinicians generally dismiss it as a contaminant. We sought to identify cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in which Candida might play a contributory etiologic role.


In a convenience sample of patients hospitalized for CAP, we screened for “high-quality sputum” by Gram stain (> 20 WBC/epithelial cell) and performed quantitative sputum cultures. Criteria for a potential etiologic role for Candida included the observation of large numbers of yeast forms on Gram stain, intracellular organisms and > 106 CFU/ml Candida in sputum. We gathered clinical information on cases that met these criteria for possible Candida infection.


Sputum from 6 of 154 consecutive CAP patients had large numbers of extra- and intracellular yeast forms on Gram stain, with > 106 CFU/ml Candida albicans, glabrata, or tropicalis on quantitative culture. In all 6 patients, the clinical diagnoses at admission included chronic aspiration. Greater than 105 CFU/ml of a recognized bacterial pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas) or > 106 CFU/ml of other ‘normal respiratory flora’ (Lactobacillus species) were present together with Candida spp. in every case. Blood cultures yielded Candida in 2 cases, and 1,3-beta-D glucan was > 500 ng/mL in 3 of 3 cases in which it was assayed. Since all patients were treated with anti-bacterial and anti-fungal drugs, no inference about etiology can be derived from therapeutic response.


Candida spp. together with a recognized bacterial pathogen or normal respiratory flora may contribute to the cause of CAP in patients who chronically aspirate.


A standard teaching amongst infectious disease specialists is that pneumonia due to Candida species is a “very rare event” [1]. These organisms regularly colonize the mouth, and their numbers can increase if antibiotics are given. When yeast forms are seen on Gram stain and Candida are grown in sputum cultures, they are generally dismissed as oropharyngeal contaminants from colonizing organisms. However, in severely immunocompromised patients, Candida spp. is known to invade locally causing thrush or, occasionally, pneumonia [1,2,3,4,5].

Definitive diagnosis of Candida pneumonia requires visualization of invasive Candida forms in the lung parenchyma. Autopsy series from large groups of immunosuppressed patients have documented the infrequent occurrence of Candida pneumonia [3,4,5]. Recent studies, however, have given more attention to a possible pathogenic role in pneumonia for Candida in combination with bacterial pathogens [6,7,8,9].

In the course of a prospective observational study that documented an important role for normal respiratory flora as the cause of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) [10], we observed a surprising number of patients in whom Candida appeared to be playing a contributory role. In each case, chronic aspiration had been identified as a possible cause in the admitting history. In the present paper, we describe the clinical and microbiologic features of these and subsequent cases and propose that Candida, together with recognized bacterial pathogens or so-called normal respiratory flora, contributes to CAP more commonly than is generally believed, particularly in patients with a history of chronic aspiration.


Study design

Cases were identified during a prospective study of a convenience sample of patients admitted to the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center between September 1, 2017 and January 31, 2020. On days selected for study, we examined Gram stains of all sputum samples that had been submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory in the preceding 24 h without first reviewing the medical record. For every sputum categorized as high-quality (> 20 white blood cells (WBC) per epithelial cell, a more rigorous standard than is usually used [11]), we reviewed the medical record to identify patients who had been admitted from the community with a diagnosis of CAP and had submitted the sputum sample within 16 h of antibiotic initiation. The diagnosis of CAP was verified based on the presence of a newly recognized pulmonary infiltrate and at least two of the following findings: subjective or objective fever; increased cough, sputum production or shortness of breath; pleuritic chest pain, rales, or confusion. Patients who had received antibiotics before hospitalization were excluded.


Methods for quantifying bacteria and Candida in sputum were described previously [10]. Briefly, sputum was solubilized with 0.4% N-acetyl cysteine, and ten-fold dilutions were made. Aliquots (0.01 ml) were streaked on blood and chocolate agar and incubated for 24–28 h at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 10% O2 and 5% CO2. WBC in solubilized sputum were quantified using a hemocytometer. The numbers of bacteria and Candida per ml sputum were calculated. Speciation was by conventional means and confirmed using MALDI-TOF.

Case definitions

Our predetermined criterion for determining an etiologic role for a recognized bacterial pathogen, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was the finding of > 105 CFU/ml in a high-quality sputum sample [10, 12,13,14,15]. To designate an etiologic role for Candida spp., we used more stringent criteria, as we have done for organisms that are usually reported as “normal respiratory flora” such as as viridans streptococci, Corynebacteria, or Lactobacillus [10, 16]: (1) Microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum showed large numbers of yeast forms, including some within polymorphonuclear leukocytes; and (2) quantitative culture demonstrated > 106 CFU Candida spp. per ml with or without other bacteria in numbers that met the above-stated criteria. In this observational study, laboratory studies, in addition to blood counts, usual blood chemistries, routine sputum and blood cultures, PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab for respiratory viruses, plasma procalcitonin, sputum WBC counts, and serum 1,3-beta-D glucan were done in a variable number of patients.


Clinical findings

Six of 154 (3.9%) patients hospitalized for CAP had sputum samples that, based on the above microbiologic criteria, suggested a contributory etiologic role for Candida spp. The median age was 73 (range: 59 to 82). In every case the admitting history noted factors associated with aspiration, and aspiration pneumonia was included as a possible diagnosis (Table). Importantly, these cases were not selected because of a history suggesting aspiration but were identified by sputum criteria, after which the historical information at admission was determined from the medical record.

Patients identified in this fashion had a high rate of comorbid conditions: the average Charlson Comorbidity Index was 8 for patients with Candida pneumonia compared to 5.5 for patients with CAP due to other respiratory pathogens (t-test, p = 0.02) [10]. Two had well-controlled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c ≤ 6.7) and none was receiving glucocorticosteroids prior to admission. One of the patients was admitted directly from a hospice facility (case 5); the others were admitted from the community. None had intravenous lines at the time of admission, but 3 were receiving nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. There was no documentation of antibiotics given in 8 weeks leading up to admission. In all cases, physical examination disclosed rales, and chest radiographs showed bilateral opacities. Thrush was noted in case 4 (Table). Computed tomography (CT) of the chest was performed in cases 4, 5, and 6. In all three, CT demonstrated bilateral patchy opacities consistent with multifocal pneumonia. Bronchiectasis was not noted. The peripheral WBC count at admission was elevated (> 10,500/mm3) in 4 cases. The median WBC count was 16,550/mm3, compared to median WBC counts of 12,800/mm3 in pneumococcal and 12,200/mm3 in Haemophilus pneumonia [17]. Plasma procalcitonin exceeded 0.5 ng/ml in 3 of 5 patients in whom it was tested.

Microbiologic findings

In all 6 cases, large numbers of yeast forms were readily apparent on sputum Gram stain; 4–14% of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) contained intracellular yeast, and pseudohyphae were seen in 5 cases (Table, Figs. 1 and 2). These patients all had > 106 CFU/ml of Candida spp. in their sputum: 3 with C. albicans, 2 with C. glabrata, and 2 with C. tropicalis (one specimen had both C. tropicalis and C. glabrata). However, no case met microbiologic criteria for pneumonia due to Candida alone: quantitative sputum cultures yielded > 105 CFU/ml of a recognized bacterial pathogen (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. aureus, and/or P. aeruginosa) in 3 cases and > 106 CFU/ml normal respiratory flora (Lactobacillus) in the other 3 cases. Gram stain and quantitative cultures yielded consistent results in all but 1 case in which many Gram positive cocci were seen but not cultured; we regarded these as probable anaerobic organisms [10]. The median number of WBC in sputum was 1.3 × 107 per ml. An assay for serum 1,3-beta-D glucan was performed in 3 cases, and the level was > 500 ng/ml in all 3. Blood cultures, done in 6 patients, yielded C. glabrata in one case, but that patient also had C. glabrata in the urine and C. albicans in the sputum. PCR for respiratory viruses was positive in 2 of 3 cases in which it was done.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A. Sputum Gram stain (case 5) at 1000x magnification showing polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes. The red background indicates protein in secretions. Absence of epithelial cells indicates absence of contamination by oropharyngeal secretions. Large numbers of budding yeast forms are seen, many of which are intracellular, with some pseudohyphae. Many fine Gram positive rods are also seen. B. Enlargement of boxed area shows what appear to be deteriorating pseudohyphae. Culture yielded 4X106 Candida tropicalis and 1.6 × 108 Lactobacillus gasseri

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sputum Gram stain (case 4) at 1000x magnification, showing many WBC with intracellular yeast and Gram positive cocci. Culture yielded 2 × 107 C. albicans, 5 × 107 S. aureus, and 4 × 107 S. pneumoniae


Anti-bacterial and anti-fungal treatments were given in all cases (fluconazole in 3 and micafungin in 3) (Table 1). Two patients ultimately had care withdrawn; the other 4 recovered. Mortality in these 6 patients was 33.3% during admission and 66.7% at 1 year.

Table 1 *Urine culture also grew Candida glabrata


In this prospective, observational study, we describe 6 of 154 patients in whom Candida spp. appeared to play a contributory etiologic role in CAP. These patients shared clinical and laboratory features that distinguished them from usual CAP patients. (1) All had conditions that suggested a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia to their admitting physicians. (2) The Charlson Comorbidity Index was substantially higher than is usual for CAP patients. (3) Gram stains of sputum showed large numbers of yeast forms, many within PMNs; (4) Quantitative cultures yielded > 106 CFU Candida per ml sputum. (5) Pseudohyphae were seen in 5 of 6 cases. (6) 1,3-beta-D-glucan was strongly positive in the 3 patients in whom it was tested.

Importantly, a Candida spp. was never detected as a sole infecting organism. Greater than 105 CFU/ml of recognized bacterial pathogens or > 106 CFU/ml of bacteria generally identified as ‘normal respiratory flora’ were also present in every case. Viral PCR was positive in 2 of 3 cases in which it was tested. In fact, 3 patients appeared to be infected with more than one Candida spp. In Case 6, two different Candida spp. were identified in sputum. In Cases 1 and 4, one Candida spp. was grown from blood and another was identified in the sputum. This seeming discrepancy results from the fact that only 1 or 2 colonies are selected for identification by MALDI-TOF. In young cultures, colonies of C. albicans and C. glabrata look alike, and the one growing in the blood might simply have been missed in the sputum. This explanation is supported by the finding of pseudohyphae in sputum from Case 1; the patient was infected with both, but only C. glabrata, which does not make pseudohyphae, was identified in sputum, whereas the blood culture yielded C. albicans. While these results do not prove that Candida spp. alone causes CAP, they suggest that Candida spp. may be a contributory cause of CAP, especially in patients who have a history of chronic aspiration.

Evidence opposing an etioloic role for Candida spp. in CAP has led to the teaching that the finding of Candida spp. in sputum culture simply reflects contamination by oropharyngeal colonization. Candida spp. regularly colonize the upper respiratory tract, with higher rates of colonization in sicker patients. An early study reported the presence of Candida in the sputum in increasing proportions of medical students, hospital employees, and patients, respectively [18]. Sputum cultures of 55% of medical inpatients yielded Candida; quantitative cultures were not done and the quality of the sputum sample was not addressed [18]. Rello et al reported that, in 28 adults with suspected pneumonia and positive sputum cultures for Candida spp., protected brush bronchoscopic specimens yielded > 103 CFU/ml Candida spp. in 24 cases, but most of these were regarded as contaminants [19]. Of 135 autopsies done on patients with evidence of pneumonia, respiratory samples from 77 had been positive for Candida spp., but none had histologic evidence of Candida pneumonia [20]. Conversely, most patients with histologic evidence of Candida pneumonia on lung biopsy did not grow Candida on premortem cultures [21]. In contrast to our work, only one of these studies quantitated Candida, and used a cutoff of 103 CFU/ml, lower than our cutoff of 106 CFU/ml.

In patients with CAP, sputum is the expectorated material that has collected in alveoli, including plasma, PMNs, and microbes. A sample that shows pure, or nearly pure PMNs and large numbers of microbial forms should reflect alveolar exudate. We have used these criteria in the past to show that non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae [13], Moraxella catarrhalis [10, 22], Corynebacterium [16] and other bacteria generally dismissed by microbiology laboratories as ‘normal respiratory flora’ [10] all may cause pneumonia. To our knowledge, no one has previously reported Gram stains and quantitative cultures of Candida in high-quality sputum samples, while requiring large numbers of organisms including intracellular forms and pseudohyphae to be seen microscopically and > 106 CFU/ml to be present. In the present study, the high quality of the sputum samples was shown by the presence of 1.3 × 107 WBC per ml (median value) and the absence of epithelial cells in microscopic fields at 1000 x magnification. We identified intracellular yeast forms within PMNs in all samples and pseudohyphae in 5 samples, further supporting a pathogenic role for Candida.

Some of these approaches have been utilized in intubated patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In one study, the presence of intracellular organisms in at least 2% of cells had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 80% for VAP [23]. Using a cutoff of 5% intracellular organisms, Torres et al, found a positive predictive value of 75% for diagnosing VAP using protected bronchoalveolar lavage [24]. In another study, a cutoff of 7% was 97% specific for diagnosing VAP [25]. We observed intracellular yeast in every sputum sample.

A limitation of the current study is the absence of a diagnosis of Candida pneumonia by lung biopsy. Without histologic evidence of invasion of yeast into lung parenchyma, Candida pneumonia cannot be diagnosed with certainty. However, most etiologic diagnoses of pneumonia are presumptive, unless organisms are also grown from a normally sterile site. Additionally, not all patients had the same evaluation including 1,3-beta-D-glucan, procalcitonin, and viral PCR. Treatment decisions were made by managing clinicians; all patients received both antibacterial and antifungal agents, and care was withdrawn in 2 cases, making it impossible to determine which treatments were beneficial.

The present study provides evidence suggesting that, in patients who have risk factors for chronic aspiration Candida spp. plays a contributory role in the etiology of CAP. We found that patients with CAP who had large numbers of Candida in a high-quality sputum sample all had a history consistent with aspiration, and in each case the infection was polymicrobial. These findings support the principle that a sufficient inoculum of organisms of low virulence into the lower respiratory tract may suffice to cause pneumonia.

The subject of yeast-bacteria interaction has been extensively studied. Roux et al have shown in rats that infection with Candida facilitates bacterial infection by interfering with the function of alveolar macrophages [6, 8], and Neely et al [26] showed that bacterial colonization of burn wounds rendered Candida more invasive [7]. In critically ill patients, the presence of Candida in sputum cultures has been associated with increased risk of VAP due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa [27].

In conclusion, by examining sputum samples submitted for Gram stain and culture, we found that, of 154 high-quality specimens (> 20 WBC per epithelial cell) from patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of CAP, 6 contained large numbers of intra- and extracellular yeast forms. Admitting physicians, unaware of microscopic findings, diagnosed chronic aspiration in all cases. Quantitative cultures revealed > 106 CFU Candida spp. per ml. Sputum from 5 samples showed pseudohyphae. One patient had candidemia, and in 3 whose serum was assayed for 1,3-beta-D-glucan, the level was markedly elevated. In every case bacterial coinfection was present and 2 patients had viral coinfection. These findings suggest that Candida spp. may play a contributory role in the etiology of CAP in patients who have a history of chronic aspiration. Future studies are needed to address whether patients with this constellation of findings benefit from antifungal therapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Community-acquired pneumonia


White blood cells


Colony-forming units


Polymorphonuclear cells


Ventilator-associated pneumonia


  1. Lionakis MS, Edwards JE Jr. Candida species. In: Bennett JE, Doliin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Duglas, and Bennett's Principles and Pracice of Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 3087–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh A, Verma R, Murari A, Agrawal A. Oral candidiasis: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2014;18(Suppl 1):S81–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Masur H, Rosen PP, Armstrong D. Pulmonary disease caused by Candida species. Am J Med. 1977;63(6):914–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohsenifar Z, Chopra SK, Johnson BL, Simmons DH. Candida pneumonia: experience with 20 patients. West J Med. 1979;131(3):196–200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haron E, Vartivarian S, Anaissie E, Dekmezian R, Bodey GP. Primary Candida pneumonia. Experience at a large cancer center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1993;72(3):137–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roux D, Gaudry S, Dreyfuss D, El-Benna J, de Prost N, Denamur E, et al. Candida albicans impairs macrophage function and facilitates Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in rat. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):1062–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peleg AY, Hogan DA, Mylonakis E. Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(5):340–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roux D, Gaudry S, Khoy-Ear L, Aloulou M, Phillips-Houlbracq M, Bex J, et al. Airway fungal colonization compromises the immune system allowing bacterial pneumonia to prevail. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):e191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pendleton KM, Huffnagle GB, Dickson RP. The significance of Candida in the human respiratory tract: our evolving understanding. Pathog Dis. 2017;75(3).

  10. Musher DM, Jesudasen SS, Barwatt JW, Cohen DN, Moss BJ, Rodriguez-Barradas MC. Normal Respiratory Flora as a Cause of Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(9):ofaa307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray PR, Washington JA II. Microscopic and bacteriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975;50(6):339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thorsteinsson SB, Musher DM, Fagan T. The diagnostic value of sputum culture in acute pneumonia. JAMA. 1975;233(8):894–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Musher DM, Kubitschek KR, Crennan J, Baughn RE. Pneumonia and acute febrile tracheobronchitis due to Haemophilus influenzae. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(4):444–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan GW, Wong GA, Hoeprich PD. Bacteriology of the lower respiratory tract as determined by fiber-optic bronchoscopy and transtracheal aspiration. J Infect Dis. 1976;134(5):428–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gadsby NJ, Russell CD, McHugh MP, Mark H, Conway Morris A, Laurenson IF, et al. Comprehensive molecular testing for respiratory pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(7):817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang K, Kruse RL, Lin WV, Musher DM. Corynebacteria as a cause of pulmonary infection: a case series and literature review. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2018;10(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoar S, Centeno FH, Musher DM. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Haemophilus Influenza. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(4):ofaa622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baum GL. The significance of Candida albicans in human sputum. N Engl J Med. 1960;263(2):70–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rello J, Esandi ME, Diaz E, Mariscal D, Gallego M, Valles J. The role of Candida sp isolated from bronchoscopic samples in nonneutropenic patients. Chest. 1998;114(1):146–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meersseman W, Lagrou K, Spriet I, Maertens J, Verbeken E, Peetermans WE, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1526–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. el-Ebiary M, Torres A, Fabregas N, de la Bellacasa JP, Gonzalez J, Ramirez J, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from respiratory samples in critically ill, non-neutropenic patients. An immediate postmortem histologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(2 Pt 1):583–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace RJ Jr, Musher DM. In honor of Dr. Sarah Branham, a star is born. The realization of Branhamella catarrhalis as a respiratory pathogen. Chest. 1986;90(3):447–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Allaouchiche B, Jaumain H, Dumontet C, Motin J. Early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Is it possible to define a cutoff value of infected cells in BAL fluid? Chest. 1996;110(6):1558–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Torres A, El-Ebiary M, Fabregas N, Gonzalez J, de la Bellacasa JP, Hernandez C, et al. Value of intracellular bacteria detection in the diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia. Thorax. 1996;51(4):378–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brasel KJ, Allen B, Edmiston C, Weigelt JA. Correlation of intracellular organisms with quantitative endotracheal aspirate. J Trauma. 2003;54(1):141–4; discussion 144-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neely AN, Law EJ, Holder IA. Increased susceptibility to lethal Candida infections in burned mice preinfected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or pretreated with proteolytic enzymes. Infect Immun. 1986;52(1):200–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Tafflet M, de Lassence A, Darmon M, Zahar JR, et al. Candida colonization of the respiratory tract and subsequent pseudomonas ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2006;129(1):110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



BJM analyzed and interpreted all data and was the primary writer of the manuscript. DMM collected, analyzed, and interpreted all data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel M. Musher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Protocol H-29468, Community-acquired pneumonia, approved by the Insitutional Review Board, Baylor College of Medicine.

Consent for publication


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moss, B.J., Musher, D.M. Candida species in community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic aspiration. Pneumonia 13, 12 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: