Open Access

Novel vaccination approaches to prevent tuberculosis in children

Pneumonia20168:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-016-0020-z

Received: 8 September 2016

Accepted: 3 November 2016

Published: 24 November 2016

Abstract

Pediatric tuberculosis (TB) is an underappreciated problem and accounts for 10 % of all TB deaths worldwide. Children are highly susceptible to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and interrupting TB spread would require the development of effective strategies to control TB transmission in pediatric populations. The current vaccine for TB, M. bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), can afford some level of protection against TB meningitis and severe forms of disseminated TB in children; however, its efficacy against pulmonary TB is variable and the vaccine does not afford life-long protective immunity. For these reasons there is considerable interest in the development of new vaccines to control TB in children. Multiple vaccine strategies are being assessed and include recombinant forms of the existing BCG vaccine, protein or viral candidates designed to boost BCG-induced immunity, or live attenuated forms of M. tuberculosis. A number of these candidates have entered clinical trials; however, no vaccine has shown improved protective efficacy compared to BCG in humans. The current challenge is to identify the most suitable candidates to progress from early to late stage clinical trials, in order to deliver a vaccine that can control and hopefully eliminate the global threat of TB.

Keywords

TuberculosisVaccine candidatesBacille Calmette-GuérinBCGImmune responseClinical trials

Background

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by the intracellular bacterial pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annually there are an estimated 9.6 million new cases of clinical TB and 1.5 million deaths, the majority occurring in South-East Asia [1]. The spread of TB is fueled by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic, the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains and socio-political disruption to health services. TB is a chronic infection and is generally considered a diseases of adulthood, however pediatric TB is an underappreciated problem. Infants under the age of two have the highest risk of contracting TB [2]. One million children contracted TB in 2014 and approximately 10 % of all TB deaths were in children [1]. The current TB vaccine, M. bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) can provide some protection against severe forms of pediatric TB, but its efficacy is variable, particularly against pulmonary disease in infants and adults. This review discusses the novel strategies being used to develop new TB vaccines, provides an overview of the candidates in clinical trials and outlines the challenges of introducing a new TB vaccine into existing childhood vaccination schedules.

Vaccination against TB: the current state of play

BCG, an attenuated live form of M. bovis, has been in use since the early 1920s and is the only approved vaccine for the control of TB in humans. BCG can afford some level of protection, particularly against TB meningitis and severe forms of disseminated TB in children [3]. In a case-controlled trial in Argentina to determine the efficacy of BCG vaccination against TB in children under the age of 6, the vaccine afforded 98 % protection against TB meningitis and miliary TB [4]. Meta-analysis of trial data showed that BCG could prevent 73 % of childhood TB meningitis and 77 % of miliary TB cases disease in children [5]. However, BCG affords variable efficacy against pulmonary TB, the predominant form of the disease, with a median of 50 % protective efficacy [6]. Recent analysis suggests that BCG can, to some extent, protect against initial infection with M. tuberculosis, however this only occurs in a small proportion of exposed individuals [7]. Compounding this is the evidence from field trials that protective immunity afforded by BCG is not lifelong and wanes 10–15 years after vaccination [3]. Considering that TB is a chronic disease where more than 90 % of cases are in adolescents and adults, the limited longevity of the vaccine’s protective effect is a significant barrier to TB control.

TB is a complex disease and M. tuberculosis has exquisitely adapted to life within the infected host. The disease is characterized by a latent phase, where the organism exists in a form that evades immune clearance, yet is unable to cause active disease [8]. An estimated 2 billion individuals are latently infected with M. tuberculosis, representing an enormous reservoir who may reactivate TB later in life. In humans and in animal models, BCG is unable to reduce latent infection and/or prevent reactivation, and as such the development of vaccines that can target latent bacteria would be a significant advance. In addition, new vaccines should induce the type of immunity proposed to protect against M. tuberculosis infection. As an obligate intracellular pathogen, a cell-mediated T-cell response is required to contain and ideally eliminate bacteria within infected host cells ([9], Fig. 1). The generation of ‘Th1-like’ CD4+ T-cell secreting multiple cytokines are considered to be those required for optimal protective immunity, and most vaccines aim to generate these T-cells at high frequency.
Fig. 1

Vaccine-induced immunity to mycobacteria. Dendritic cells (DCs) are activated by vaccine components, such as adjuvants engaging pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which leads to the presentation of peptide fragments to CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells. Both Th1 and Th17 CD4+ T-cell subsets are associated with protective responses in animal models of M. tuberculosis infection, in particular through the stimulation of infected host cells such as macrophages (MAC) to eliminate ingested bacteria. Cytokines (e.g. IL-2) secreted by Th1 CD4+ T-cells promote the maintenance of memory T-cell populations (Tmem). Although B cells may be stimulated to produce antibody upon vaccination, they appear to have little role in protection against mycobacteria and are not typically a target of rationally designed vaccines

In order to address the deficiencies of BCG, multiple strategies are being used to develop improved TB vaccine candidates. These include boosting BCG-induced immunity, modifying the existing BCG vaccine to improve its effectiveness, or replacing BCG with improved live vaccine candidates. The remainder of this review will describe the current TB vaccine candidates that have advanced to clinical trials, including those developed to prevent TB in children.

Boosting BCG: subunit vaccines M. tuberculosis antigens

It is likely that BCG will remain part of current vaccine schedules, considering its good safety profile and its effectiveness against severe childhood forms of TB. For this reason there is particular interest in the development of subunit vaccines composed of protective M. tuberculosis antigens, as these may be used to ‘boost’ the protective response developed by BCG. A handful of vaccines have now entered clinical trials [10], however most of these vaccines make use of a small subset of related secreted antigens. This is despite the fact that M. tuberculosis expresses literally hundreds of antigenic targets, including non-secreted proteins [11] and no single mycobacterial antigen is recognised by all M. tuberculosis-infected individuals [1214]. For this reason, all protein vaccines in clinical trials encode multiple antigens to expand the immune recognition of the vaccine (Table 1). In addition, the method of subunit protein delivery is critical for vaccine efficacy and considerable effort has been expended on the identification of potent adjuvants that are nevertheless sufficiently safe and well tolerated for human use [15].
Table 1

Tuberculosis vaccine candidates in clinical trials

Category

Vaccine

Clinical trial stage

Trials in childrena

Vaccine Description

Subunit – protein in adjuvant

M72/AS01

Phase IIb

NCT01098474 (Phase II)

Fusion protein (Mtb39a, Mtb32a) in AS01 adjuvant

H1/IC31

Phase IIa

 

Fusion protein (Ag85B, ESAT-6) in IC31 adjuvant

H4/IC31

Phase II

NCT01861730 (Phase I/II)

Fusion protein (Ag85B, TB10.4) in IC31 adjuvant

H56/IC31

Phase IIa

 

Fusion protein (Ag85B, ESAT-6, Rv2660c) in IC31 adjuvant

ID93/GLA-SE

Phase I

 

Fusion protein (Rv3619, Rv1813c, Rv3620c, Rv2608) in GLA-SE adjuvant

Subunit – viral vectors

MVA85A

Phase IIb

NCT00953927 (Phase IIb)

Replication-deficient vaccinia Ankara virus expressing Ag85A

Ad5Ag85A

  

Replication-deficient adenovirus-5 expressing Ag85A

AD35.TB-S

 

NCT01198366 (Phase II)

Replication-defective adenovirus-35 expressing Ag85A, Ag85B, TB10.4

Recombinant BCG

rBCG30

Phase I (discontinued)

 

Recombinant BCG over-expressing Ag85B

VPM1002

Phase IIa

NCT01479972 (Phase I) NCT02391415 (Phase IIa)

Recombinant BCG deleted of ureC gene and expressing L. monocytogenes LLO

AERAS-422

Phase I (discontinued)

 

Recombinant BCG expressing Ag85A, Ag85B, Rv3407

Attenuated M. tuberculosis

MTBVAC

Phase IIa

NCT02729571 (Phase I)

Live attenuated M. tuberculosis deleted of phoP and fadD26 genes

Inactivated Mycobacteria

Dar-901

Phase I

 

Heat-inactivated Mycobacterium obuense

a Clinical trial identifier as taken from www.clinicaltrials.gov

The most advanced fusion protein candidate in terms of clinical development is M72/AS01. The vaccine is a fusion of two mycobacterial proteins, Mtb39a and Mtb32a, delivered in the AS01 adjuvant, which includes the immune-stimulants 3-O-desacyl-4′-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and Quillaja saponaria fraction 1 (QS21) combined with liposomes (AS01) [16, 17]. In a Phase I/II trial the vaccine was well tolerated and induced high levels of polyfunctional M72-specific CD4+ T-cell and persistent antibody responses [17]. Numerous Phase II trials in adolescents [18], adults [19] or BCG-vaccinated infants [20] demonstrated the generation of polyfunctional CD4+ T-cells, augmented humoral responses and no adverse events associated with the vaccine. Importantly, immune responses and vaccine safety were not altered when the vaccine was delivered to infants together with Expanded-Programme-on-Immunization (EPI) vaccines [20]. The vaccine was shown to retain immunogenicity in HIV+ subjects on anti-retroviral therapy [21] and has recently entered a Phase IIb proof of concept efficacy study in latently-infected adults (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01755598).

A number of fusion protein vaccines, based on the secreted Ag85B protein of M. tuberculosis, are currently under evaluation in humans. Hybrid 1/IC31 comprises Ag85B fused with the early secretory antigenic target 6 (ESAT6), an immunogenic antigen absent from BCG [22]. The fusion protein is adjuvanted with IC31, a 2-component adjuvant comprising an 11-mer antibacterial peptide (KLK) and a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN1a), a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist [23]. In Phase I and II trials the vaccine has demonstrated strong, sustained generation of T-cell responses in naïve volunteers [24], individuals previously BCG vaccinated/M. tuberculosis infected [25] and HIV+ individuals [26]. Hybrid 4/IC31 (AERAS-404) includes the TB10.4 antigen instead of ESAT-6, due to the latter being a component of the Quantiferon Gold diagnostic test for M. tuberculosis infection. Hybrid 4/IC31 induced persistent polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses in adults [27] and the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection with M. tuberculosis in adolescents is currently under evaluation (NCT02075203). Hybrid 56/IC31 (AERAS-456) is a modified version of Hybrid 1 that includes Rv2660c, an antigen strongly recognized by the immune response of latent TB patients [28]. The vaccine was shown to protect non-human primates against reactivation of latent M. tuberculosis infection [29] and was immunogenic when delivered to healthy adults with or without previous M. tuberculosis infection [30]. An ongoing Phase I trial will assess the safety and immunogenicity of Hybrid 56/IC31 in HIV-negative subjects recently treated for drug-susceptible pulmonary TB (NCT02375698) and in BCG-primed infants (NCT01861730).

ID93/GLA-SE is a fusion of four unique antigens (Rv2608, Rv3619, Rv1813, Rv3620) identified during a screen for human anti-mycobacterial T-cell antigens [31]. The vaccine is formulated with the TLR adjuvant glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-stable emulsion (GLA-SE) and has shown good protective efficacy in a number of pre-clinical animal models, including mice and guinea pigs, with the generation of polyfunctional T-cell subsets [32]. No clinical data on ID93/GLA-SE has been reported; however, the vaccine is undergoing safety/immunogenicity testing in healthy volunteers (Phase I, NCT01599897, NCT01927159) and in patients following successful completion of TB treatment (NCT02465216).

Boosting BCG: recombinant viral vectors

Viral vectors have been extensively studied as vaccines to control many pathogens, due to their ability to induce robust cellular and humoral immune responses [33]. The eradication of smallpox by the vaccinia virus has focused attention on the use of poxviruses as vaccine vectors, in particular modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) [33]. MVA85A (AERAS-485), in which the M. tuberculosis Ag85A protein is expressed by MVA, was the first TB vaccine to enter human trials [34]. The vaccine, which has been tested in multiple Phase I/IIa studies in adults, adolescents, children and infants, was shown to be well tolerated and induce diverse vaccine-specific T-cell responses [35]. However, in a Phase IIb efficacy trial to test a BCG-prime, MVA85A-boost regimen in BCG-vaccinated South African infants, the vaccine did not provide improved protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis infection or disease [36]. An additional Phase IIb trial assessing the efficacy in healthy adults infected with HIV in South Africa and Senegal demonstrated significant T-cell responses induced by the vaccine but there was no improved efficacy against M. tuberculosis infection or disease in the MVA85A group compared to placebo [37]. Although the consistency of the pre-clinical animal data supporting this vaccine has been questioned [38], the vaccine has been instrumental in the development of large-scale clinical efficacy trials of vaccines against TB and developing protocols for defining correlates of TB vaccine-induced protection in humans [35].

Replication-deficient adenoviral vectors are an additional class of vaccine vectors that are being utilised for recombinant antigen delivery [33]. AdAg85A is an adenoviral serotype 5 vector expressing the M. tuberculosis Ag85A protein. In preclinical animal models the vaccine provided optimal protective efficacy when delivered mucosally, in particular the boosting of prior BCG immunization [39]. The vaccine has been tested in humans after intramuscular delivery, however the study was terminated for undefined reasons (NCT00800670). One important issue with adenoviral vectors is the observation that pre-existing Ad5 antibodies have been shown to correlate with Ad5-based HIV vaccine failure [40]. However, infants appear to have reduced levels of neutralizing Ad5 antibodies, which suggests these vaccines may be more suitable for pediatric populations [41]. Pre-existing vector-specific immunity has been overcome by use of chimpanzee adenoviruses (ChAds), with a number of ChAds in clinical trials [33]. This includes a ChAd vector expressing M. tuberculosis Ag85A (ChAdOx185A), which is being assessed together with a MVA85A boost in adults (NCT01829490). AD35.TB-S (AERAS-402) is a replication-deficient serotype 35 adenovirus that encodes a fusion of 3 M. tuberculosis (Ag85A, Ag85B, TB10.4) and has been assessed in BCG-vaccinated infants and adults, as well as HIV+ individuals [4244]. The vaccine induced polyfunctional CD4+/CD8+ T-cell and antibody responses to the encoded vaccine antigens, yet induced a modest level of Ad35 antibodies [4244].

Improving BCG: recombinant forms of BCG

Despite the limitations of BCG described above, the vaccine does induce some level of protection against childhood forms of TB, and BCG vaccination can reduce mortality in children due to other diseases [45]. Therefore, a major focus of TB vaccine development programs is the development of modified forms of BCG to improve the protective efficacy of the vaccine (reviewed in [46]). Of the numerous recombinant BCG strains developed, only three have undergone human trials. rBCG30, which overexpresses the immunodominant Ag85B protein, demonstrated improved efficacy in M. tuberculosis-infected guinea pigs, in terms of reduced bacterial loads and improved survival compared to BCG-only vaccinated animals [47]. Although the vaccine was demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic in a Phase I clinical trial in adults, the vaccine is not being pursued further [48]. An alternative strategy was taken in the development of VPM1002, a recombinant BCG expressing the Listeria monocytogenes enzyme listeriolysin O (LLO) and deleted of the ureC gene, in order to facilitate LLO function. Listeriolysin perforates the phagosomal membrane, allowing leakage of enzymes and bacterial components into the cytoplasm and increased apoptosis of the infected cell, resulting in enhanced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses [49]. The vaccine candidate has completed a Phase I trial in infants (NCT01479972), and is currently being assessed for safety and immunogenicity in HIV-exposed newborns (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02391415).

A dual strategy of antigen overexpression and immune modulation was employed in the development of AERAS-422, a BCG strain expressing the pore-forming perfringolysin of Clostridium perfringens and selected immunodominant antigens expressed by M. tuberculosis during active infection (Ag85A and Ag85B) and reactivation of latent infection (Rv3407) [50]. In a Phase I trial in adults, the vaccine induced strong antigen-specific T-cell responses; however, two of eight vaccinees developed varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, resulting in the discontinuation of the vaccine’s development [51].

Replacing BCG: live attenuated mycobacterial strains

An alternative approach to TB vaccine design is to use live mycobacterial strains to replace BCG in the childhood vaccine schedule. When compared to virulent M. tuberculosis isolates, more than one hundred genes are absent in the BCG genome [52], and a subset of these genes may be important protective antigens. Therefore, a rationally attenuated form of M. tuberculosis may more closely ‘mimic’ the immune repertoire generated by natural infection. MTBVAC is the first live-attenuated M. tuberculosis-based vaccine to undergo testing in humans. MTBVAC contains two independent stable deletion mutations in the virulence genes phoP and fadD26, without the inclusion of antibiotic resistance markers, thus fulfilling the second Geneva Consensus requirements for progression of live mycobacterial vaccines to human trials [53, 54]. The vaccine afforded significant protection against M. tuberculosis in pre-clinical models [55] and induced markedly enhanced T-cell immunity compared to the BCG vaccine in mice [56]. In a Phase I clinical trial MTBVAC did not induce any serious adverse events and elicited the generation of polyfunctional CD4+ central memory T-cells in vaccinees [57]. Encouragingly, vaccine safety and immunogenicity is currently being assessed in newborns in a Phase I trial (NCT02729571).

Inactivated whole-cell mycobacterial strains are also being assessed, although mainly as post-infection/immunotherapeutic vaccines, with the aim of preventing reactivation and/or shortening the course of drug-treatment for TB. The immunotherapeutic potential of these vaccines has been reviewed elswehere [58] and will not be discussed here. One inactivated vaccine, termed Dar-901, is under evaluation as a preventative TB vaccine. Dar-901 consists of the heat-inactivated non-tuberculous M. obuense and is part of a Phase I clinical trial for safety and immunogenicity healthy adults (NCT02063555), and is currently recruiting for a Phase II trial as a booster to prevent TB in adoloscents (NCT02712424).

Challenges of TB vaccine development

A number of challenges remain before a new vaccine can be introduced to either complement or replace the existing BCG vaccine. Although there is an appreciation that multiple antigens should be included into subunit vaccine to broaden the immune response generated, many candidates use single antigens—in particular Ag85A, which in a recent study was not strongly recognized by the immune response of TB patients [14]. Unlike viruses, which tend express a limited number of antigenic targets, the antigen repertoire of mycobacteria is broad and includes poorly expressed and cryptic epitopes that may contribute to protection [59]. Therefore new vaccine candidates should ideally express a selection of antigens that are strongly recognised by the human immune response during all stages of the TB life cycle. In addition, assessment of antigen immune recognition has typically been performed in adult TB patients, rather than children [14] and it is possible that the infant immune system may display differential recognition of antigens. Compounding this is the fact that most clinical trials of TB vaccine have been performed in adolescent or adult populations (Table 1), thus limiting our knowledge of vaccine-induced immunity in children.

An additional consideration is the lack of defined immune correlates of protection against M. tuberculosis infection. Certain immune responses appear to correlate with protection against M. tuberculosis in animal models, such as CD4+ T-cell secreting mutiple cytokines, termed ‘polyfunctional T’ cells [60]. However, the presence of polyfunctional T-cells in either MVA85A-vaccinated adults or BCG-vaccinated infants did not correlate with protection against TB in humans [36, 61]. While this may be a function of the particular vaccine tested, it does suggest that a greater breadth of immune paramaters should be examined as potential ‘biomarkers’ of protection, including non-conventional T-cells and components of the innate immune response [9]. Importantly, while the mouse is the major animal model used for testing of TB vaccines, the relative contribution of immune cell subsets may differ between the mouse, humans and other models such as non-human primates [62]. This makes it difficult to extrapolate findings from animal models to humans. While a human challenge model for TB has been proposed [63], the curent model relies on use of the attenuated BCG vaccine as the challenge organism, which lacks important TB vaccine antigens, and further optimisation is required to overcome the low level of recovery of the challenge strain [64]. However, such a model would provide an important tool for TB vaccine research, considering the expense of large phase IIb and phase III clinical trials to determine vaccine efficacy for a chronic infection such as TB, together with the lack of markers of protective immunity in humans.

Conclusions

The past decade has seen major advances in the development of TB vaccines, with a number of vaccines now in clinical trials (Table 1) and one vaccine having completed Phase IIb assessment of efficacy [36]. However, no vaccine has demonstrated improved protective efficacy in humans compared to the existing BCG vaccine, and the immunological parameters required for effective protective efficacy in humans are not known. This suggests that innovative and novel TB vaccine approaches are required and these vaccines should elicit immune responses that differ from those candidates that have already been evaluated in humans. Effective control of TB transmission will require the delivery of a vaccine that can block/limit M. tuberculosis infection during initial exposure to the pathogen, which in endemic areas would be during early childhood, and thus the testing of new candidates in infant populations should be a priority.

Abbreviations

BCG: 

Bacille Calmette-Guérin

ChAds: 

Chimpanzee adenoviruses

GLA-SE: 

Glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-stable emulsion

MPL: 

3-O-desacyl-4′-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL)

MVA: 

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara

TB: 

Tuberculosis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Grant (APP1043519) and the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Tuberculosis Control (APP1043225). We acknowledge the support of the European H2020 grant TBVAC2020 15 643381.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

JT, CC made substantial contributions to the conception of work. JT, CC wrote the manuscript. JT, CC critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and agreed with the manuscript results and conclusions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunity Group, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney
(2)
Tuberculosis Research Program, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney
(3)
Sydney Medical School and the Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney

References

  1. Organization WH. Global tuberculosis report 2015. Only available online: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/. 2015.
  2. Perez-Velez CM, Marais BJ. Tuberculosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):348–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mangtani P, Abubakar I, Ariti C, Beynon R, Pimpin L, Fine PE, et al. Protection by BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(4):470–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Miceli I, De Kantor IN, Colaiacovo D, Peluffo G, Cutillo I, Gorra R, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of BCG vaccination using the case–control method in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Int J Epidemiol. 1988;17(3):629–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C. Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: a meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV, et al. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA. 1994;271(9):698–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Roy A, Eisenhut M, Harris RJ, Rodrigues LC, Sridhar S, Habermann S, et al. Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4643.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dheda K, Barry 3rd CE, Maartens G. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2016;387(10024):1211–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nunes-Alves C, Booty MG, Carpenter SM, Jayaraman P, Rothchild AC, Behar SM. In search of a new paradigm for protective immunity to TB. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(4):289–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaufmann SH, Lange C, Rao M, Balaji KN, Lotze M, Schito M, et al. Progress in tuberculosis vaccine development and host-directed therapies-a state of the art review. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(4):301–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pinto R, Leotta L, Shanahan ER, West NP, Leyh TS, Britton W, et al. Host cell-induced components of the sulfate assimilation pathway are major protective antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(5):778–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Roche PW, Triccas JA, Avery DT, Fifis T, Billman-Jacobe H, Britton WJ. Differential T cell responses to mycobacteria-secreted proteins distinguish vaccination with Bacille Calmette-Guerin from infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(5):1326–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sutherland JS, Lalor MK, Black GF, Ambrose LR, Loxton AG, Chegou NN, et al. Analysis of host responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in a multi-site study of subjects with different TB and HIV infection states in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9), e74080.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter C, Sidney J, Kolla R, Nayak K, Tomiyama H, Tomiyama C, et al. A side-by-side comparison of T cell reactivity to fifty-nine Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in diverse populations from five continents. Tuberculosis. 2015;95(6):713–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Agger EM. Novel adjuvant formulations for delivery of anti-tuberculosis vaccine candidates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;17.Google Scholar
  16. Skeiky YA, Lodes MJ, Guderian JA, Mohamath R, Bement T, Alderson MR, et al. Cloning, expression, and immunological evaluation of two putative secreted serine protease antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1999;67(8):3998–4007.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Leroux-Roels I, Forgus S, De Boever F, Clement F, Demoitie MA, Mettens P, et al. Improved CD4(+) T cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in PPD-negative adults by M72/AS01 as compared to the M72/AS02 and Mtb72F/AS02 tuberculosis candidate vaccine formulations: a randomized trial. Vaccine. 2013;31(17):2196–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Penn-Nicholson A, Geldenhuys H, Burny W, van der Most R, Day CL, Jongert E, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of candidate vaccine M72/AS01E in adolescents in a TB endemic setting. Vaccine. 2015;33(32):4025–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Montoya J, Solon JA, Cunanan SR, Acosta L, Bollaerts A, Moris P, et al. A randomized, controlled dose-finding Phase II study of the M72/AS01 candidate tuberculosis vaccine in healthy PPD-positive adults. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(8):1360–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Idoko OT, Owolabi OA, Owiafe PK, Moris P, Odutola A, Bollaerts A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the M72/AS01 candidate tuberculosis vaccine when given as a booster to BCG in Gambian infants: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Tuberculosis. 2014;94(6):564–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumarasamy N, Poongulali S, Bollaerts A, Moris P, Beulah FE, Ayuk LN, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Safety, and Immunogenicity Trial of the M72/AS01 Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine in HIV-Positive Indian Adults. Medicine. 2016;95(3), e2459.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Weinrich Olsen A, Van Pinxteren LA, Meng Okkels L, Birk Rasmussen P, Andersen P. Protection of mice with a tuberculosis subunit vaccine based on a fusion protein of antigen 85B and ESAT-6. Infect Immun. 2001;69(5):2773–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Aichinger MC, Ginzler M, Weghuber J, Zimmermann L, Riedl K, Schutz G, et al. Adjuvating the adjuvant: facilitated delivery of an immunomodulatory oligonucleotide to TLR9 by a cationic antimicrobial peptide in dendritic cells. Vaccine. 2011;29(3):426–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Dissel JT, Arend SM, Prins C, Bang P, Tingskov PN, Lingnau K, et al. Ag85B-ESAT-6 adjuvanted with IC31 promotes strong and long-lived Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific T cell responses in naive human volunteers. Vaccine. 2010;28(20):3571–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Dissel JT, Soonawala D, Joosten SA, Prins C, Arend SM, Bang P, et al. Ag85B-ESAT-6 adjuvanted with IC31(R) promotes strong and long-lived Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific T cell responses in volunteers with previous BCG vaccination or tuberculosis infection. Vaccine. 2011;29(11):2100–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reither K, Katsoulis L, Beattie T, Gardiner N, Lenz N, Said K, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of H1/IC31(R), an adjuvanted TB subunit vaccine, in HIV-infected adults with CD4+ lymphocyte counts greater than 350 cells/mm3: a phase II, multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12), e114602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Geldenhuys H, Mearns H, Miles DJ, Tameris M, Hokey D, Shi Z, et al. The tuberculosis vaccine H4:IC31 is safe and induces a persistent polyfunctional CD4 T cell response in South African adults: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015;33(30):3592–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. He H, Yang H, Deng Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis dormancy-associated antigen of Rv2660c induces stronger immune response in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection than that in active tuberculosis in a Chinese population. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(6):1103–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin PL, Dietrich J, Tan E, Abalos RM, Burgos J, Bigbee C, et al. The multistage vaccine H56 boosts the effects of BCG to protect cynomolgus macaques against active tuberculosis and reactivation of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(1):303–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Luabeya AK, Kagina BM, Tameris MD, Geldenhuys H, Hoff ST, Shi Z, et al. First-in-human trial of the post-exposure tuberculosis vaccine H56:IC31 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected and non-infected healthy adults. Vaccine. 2015;33(33):4130–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bertholet S, Ireton GC, Kahn M, Guderian J, Mohamath R, Stride N, et al. Identification of human T cell antigens for the development of vaccines against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2008;181(11):7948–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Baldwin SL, Bertholet S, Reese VA, Ching LK, Reed SG, Coler RN. The importance of adjuvant formulation in the development of a tuberculosis vaccine. J Immunol. 2012;188(5):2189–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ewer K, Lambe T, Rollier C, Spencer A, Hill A, Dorrell L. Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: from immunogenicity to impact. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;41:47–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McShane H, Pathan AA, Sander CR, Keating SM, Gilbert SC, Huygen K, et al. Recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A boosts BCG-primed and naturally acquired antimycobacterial immunity in humans. Nature Med. 2004;10(11):1240–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Shea MK, McShane H. A review of clinical models for the evaluation of human TB vaccines. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2016;12(5):1177–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tameris MD, Hatherill M, Landry BS, Scriba TJ, Snowden MA, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9871):1021–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ndiaye BP, Thienemann F, Ota M, Landry BS, Camara M, Dieye S, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A in healthy adults infected with HIV-1: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(3):190–200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kashangura R, Sena ES, Young T, Garner P. Effects of MVA85A vaccine on tuberculosis challenge in animals: systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(6):1970–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Xing Z, McFarland CT, Sallenave JM, Izzo A, Wang J, McMurray DN. Intranasal mucosal boosting with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine markedly enhances the protection of BCG-primed guinea pigs against pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(6), e5856.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Buchbinder SP, Mehrotra DV, Duerr A, Fitzgerald DW, Mogg R, Li D, et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9653):1881–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Appaiahgari MB, Pandey RM, Vrati S. Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies to adenovirus type 5 among children in India: implications for recombinant adenovirus-based vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14(8):1053–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Churchyard GJ, Snowden MA, Hokey D, Dheenadhayalan V, McClain JB, Douoguih M, et al. The safety and immunogenicity of an adenovirus type 35-vectored TB vaccine in HIV-infected, BCG-vaccinated adults with CD4(+) T cell counts >350 cells/mm(3). Vaccine. 2015;33(15):1890–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kagina BM, Tameris MD, Geldenhuys H, Hatherill M, Abel B, Hussey GD, et al. The novel tuberculosis vaccine, AERAS-402, is safe in healthy infants previously vaccinated with BCG, and induces dose-dependent CD4 and CD8 T cell responses. Vaccine. 2014;32(45):5908–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Walsh DS, Owira V, Polhemus M, Otieno L, Andagalu B, Ogutu B, et al. Adenovirus type 35-vectored tuberculosis vaccine has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in healthy, BCG-vaccinated, QuantiFERON((R))-TB Gold (+) Kenyan adults without evidence of tuberculosis. Vaccine. 2016;34(21):2430–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kleinnijenhuis J, Van Crevel R, Netea MG. Trained immunity: consequences for the heterologous effects of BCG vaccination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015;109(1):29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Triccas JA. Recombinant BCG, as a vaccine vehicle to protect against tuberculosis. Bioengineered bugs. 2010;1(2):110–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Horwitz MA, Harth G, Dillon BJ, Maslesa-Galic S. Recombinant bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) vaccines expressing the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30-kDa major secretory protein induce greater protective immunity against tuberculosis than conventional BCG vaccines in a highly susceptible animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(25):13853–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoft DF, Blazevic A, Abate G, Hanekom WA, Kaplan G, Soler JH, et al. A new recombinant bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine safely induces significantly enhanced tuberculosis-specific immunity in human volunteers. J Infect Dis. 2008;198(10):1491–501.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Farinacci M, Weber S, Kaufmann SH. The recombinant tuberculosis vaccine rBCG DeltaureC::hly(+) induces apoptotic vesicles for improved priming of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Vaccine. 2012;30(52):7608–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun R, Skeiky YA, Izzo A, Dheenadhayalan V, Imam Z, Penn E, et al. Novel recombinant BCG expressing perfringolysin O and the over-expression of key immunodominant antigens; pre-clinical characterization, safety and protection against challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Vaccine. 2009;27(33):4412–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoft DF, Blazevic A, Selimovic A, Turan A, Tennant J, Abate G, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Recombinant BCG Vaccine AERAS-422 in Healthy BCG-naïve Adults: A Randomized, Active-controlled, First-in-human Phase 1 Trial. EBioMedicine. 2016;5(7):278–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Brosch R, Gordon SV, Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Frigui W, Valenti P, et al. Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(13):5596–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Arbues A, Aguilo JI, Gonzalo-Asensio J, Marinova D, Uranga S, Puentes E, et al. Construction, characterization and preclinical evaluation of MTBVAC, the first live-attenuated M. tuberculosis-based vaccine to enter clinical trials. Vaccine. 2013;31(42):4867–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker KB, Brennan MJ, Ho MM, Eskola J, Thiry G, Sadoff J, et al. The second Geneva Consensus: Recommendations for novel live TB vaccines. Vaccine. 2010;28(11):2259–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Scriba TJ, Kaufmann SH, Lambert PH, Sanicas M, Martin C, Neyrolles O. Vaccination against tuberculosis with whole cell mycobacterial vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2016;111(4):223–31.Google Scholar
  56. Nambiar JK, Pinto R, Aguilo JI, Takatsu K, Martin C, Britton WJ, et al. Protective immunity afforded by attenuated, PhoP-deficient Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with sustained generation of CD4+ T-cell memory. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(2):385–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Spertini F, Audran R, Chakour R, Karoui O, Steiner-Monard V, Thierry AC, et al. Safety of human immunisation with a live-attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase I trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(12):953–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Groschel MI, Prabowo SA, Cardona PJ, Stanford JL, van der Werf TS. Therapeutic vaccines for tuberculosis--a systematic review. Vaccine. 2014;32(26):3162–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Woodworth JS, Aagaard CS, Hansen PR, Cassidy JP, Agger EM, Andersen P. Protective CD4 T cells targeting cryptic epitopes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resist infection-driven terminal differentiation. J Immunol. 2014;192(7):3247–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindenstrom T, Knudsen NP, Agger EM, Andersen P. Control of chronic mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by CD4 KLRG1- IL-2-secreting central memory cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(12):6311–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kagina BM, Abel B, Scriba TJ, Hughes EJ, Keyser A, Soares A, et al. Specific T cell frequency and cytokine expression profile do not correlate with protection against tuberculosis after bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination of newborns. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(8):1073–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Chen CY, Huang D, Wang RC, Shen L, Zeng G, Yao S, et al. A critical role for CD8 T cells in a nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(4), e1000392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Minassian AM, Satti I, Poulton ID, Meyer J, Hill AV, McShane H. A human challenge model for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(7):1035–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Minhinnick A, Harris S, Wilkie M, Peter J, Stockdale L, Manjaly-Thomas ZR, et al. Optimization of a Human Bacille Calmette-Guerin Challenge Model: A Tool to Evaluate Antimycobacterial Immunity. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(5):824–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016